Every Rejected Citation Requires a Reason for Rejection

Every rejected citation must include a reason for rejection. This is a critical step in the review process because it provides publishers with a clear understanding of why the rejected citation does not meet the requirements of the breakout. Your rejection reason should be specific and constructive, and not simply restate the breakout language. The writing best practices shown here apply directly to your rejection rationales.

For example, focus on what is missing or insufficient in the cited content relative to the breakout requirement. Avoid vague language; instead, explain precisely why the cited material does not satisfy the standard so the publisher understands what changes or additions would be needed.

IMRA Writing Best Practices

Use strong academic writing. Ensure your language is precise and accurate.
Write in simple, direct sentences to make your points clear.
Include only the most relevant information in your submissions.
Provide only the most relevant information when describing locations to help publishers find the issue quickly.
Maintain a neutral and professional tone.
Be consistent with terminology, spelling, punctuation, and formatting.
Focus on clarity. Your submission should be easy for the publisher to understand and act on without additional explanation.